There is no ‘boy crisis’.

Please forgive the clickbait title.

When it comes to single MOTHER households, the drop of testosterone and suicide there indeed is a crisis among men.

But there is no ‘college crisis’ or ‘labor force crisis’ when it comes to men.

Yes, men are dropping out left and right and are less ‘educated’ than women, but hear me out.

This is a good thing for a multitude of reasons.

Apparently all graduates are now 58% or so female, to which I ask ‘as what?’

You have to keep in mind that with most of these ‘researches’ they take the average and use terms in the general description.

With ‘graduates’ dumb shit like ‘art history’ and ‘music therapy’ graduates are also included.

And just like the pay gap when you take averages the outcome can be used to push an agenda.

Aka ‘women earn less than men!’ which on average is true, but on average men also make more hours, have better paying jobs etc. etc. etc. You know the drill.

Now take the ‘men are dropping out of the workforce’ narrative.

To which I ask: ‘which part of the workforce?’

Rollo put me onto Richard Reeves new book ‘Of Boys And Men’ and before I actually purchased the book that contains everything I already know, I wondered what the problem this week was.

I read this article:

Note: He addresses that the pay gap has 2 sides and men have been starting to earn less, but he doesn’t mention the horrible manipulative message the pay gap actually is, so this guy to me is part of the problem he spews to want to be solving.

Another sock puppet for the societal feminine imperative. 

And in said article there was something that confirmed my suspicion about it not being about the overall workforce, but just a part of it. A part which has more than one benefactors other than men. 

‘We’ve had decades of scholarships to get women into STEM. I think that’s been great, but I think we now need scholarships to get men into HEAL.’

‘Heal’ stands for: health, education, administration and literacy. 

And what do you know?!

All these sectors are female dominated, because of biological hardwires interests.

I don’t know about you, but I’ve worked in administration and it was boring as hell.

I tried education, and it was so feminized and rotten with marxist talking point I jumped ship right on time. 

And what the hell is literacy for a sector, as in writers?

Excuse me, but I can name you a plethora of male authors, they’re just not registered under the traditional publishing firms.

Which might just be the EXACT reason this is a so called ‘crisis’.

Men are finding their own way of getting what they need and want.

They no longer go to college because they don’t have to.

They no longer go to corporate because they don’t have to.

It just isn’t in line with what society had in mind for them and since ‘society’ a.k.a. the feminine imperative, doesn’t like to be told ‘no’, we are now in a so called ‘crisis’.

Men are failing in society!

Men are failing in college!

Oh, so they’re dropping out of white collar jobs and refuse to take life altering amounts of debt to adhere by the rules you’ve laid out to follow as  requirement to be what you deem as a ‘well functioning member of society’?

Yeah, I’ll just upload fitness advice to Youtube, let the market decide if my advice is of value and grab my forklift certificate for no less than €300 so I can get a well paying job in the blue collar sector.

There isn’t a ‘boy’ crisis in education and or the labor force.

There’s a ‘women don’t have enough men to choose from’ crisis.

There’s a ‘institutions aren’t getting paid by men and are missing out on profits because of it’ crisis. 

Don’t let the narrative fool you into going back to the plantation, boys. 

Ferral, Reeves and yes even Peterson are in the end just allies to the narrative. 

Look At The Circumstances Not The Product

They’re real

As one might know I am a pretty huge geek.

Ever since I’ve been able to afford it I have been trying to get my original Pokemon card collection back, but in it’s original Japanese release instead of the English release for a multitude of reasons I shall not get into.

On Dutch ebay I found 2 Japanese booster packs for the price of 1,5 and was able to get it to the price of 1. The seller proceeds then to try and get my to cover the shipping with the phrase:

‘I am used to buyers covering the shipping.’

To which I so ever lovingly respond to with:

‘Well, if there are other interested parties I will be happy to put the deal on hold until you get a better offer.’

‘Your price with shipping included is fine 🙂 What’s your adress?’

You’re goddamn right.

What was happening here is that the seller thought he could strong arm me for shipping which wasn’t even 5% of the price I was paying for the boosters or not send them.

The situation however did not allow him that position since I was the only one bidding and offer he got over the last 2 weeks after a month of that add being up on Ebay.

I had the high ground.

Of course this was a great deal and I could have missed out on those OG Japanese booster packs, but it shouldn’t rely on the product if I got them or not.

It should rely on the situation.

Which leads me to why you are all here: The gurlzah.

I had a date 2 weeks ago with a lovely young lady with an enormous full head of thicc hair which I just couldn’t help but wanting to hold on to.

She was fun, intelligent and pleasant to be around and got bonus creds for being freaky as hell.

However the situation was a tad different.

She lived an hour away by car, was 19, in college (medical student), talked mostly about boozing it up with her friends and living in an anti-squatting apartment complex with mostly stoners.

Explain to me dear viewer how likely these chances are of her being open to a second date or just being overrun by options because of #1 her place in the SMP #2 her lifestyle.


But this time I was focussed on the product because she was pretty and freaky and thin.

I got invested and it showed in my texting.

I got left on read a week ago.

I looked at the product at not the circumstances.

I’m not saying don’t try to get the second date, but look at the effort you’re putting in and what’s actually being presented surrounding the nice pair of legs and tits.

The strongest negotiating position is being to walk away and mean it.

Modern Media Was Not Made For You And It Never Was.

How would you open?: “I fucked bigger”

So few of you might know I am a huge geek, I haven’t been trying to hide it very well either.

I loved Transformers and Star Wars as a kid.

Religiously watched X-men the animated series and knew exactly which number which Pokémon was.

And as an adult I dabble into nostalgia and even in the outrage culture that comes with it.

But I do find it funny that it only took them so long to find out what we knew for so long, but to quote Nick Krauser:

“Pua has done more for the social sciences than 1000’s of peer review studies have done”

Paraphrasing here, shut up.

Men have been portrayed as idiots for as long as I have been watching television.

From Homer in The Simpsons, to Peter and Chris in Family Guy, to Billy in Billy and Mandy, from Every leading male in every sitcom.

Now the creators at Disney have just become less obvious about it.

Wolverine, Gambit and Beast (not Cyclops) used to be pretty badass in their own way, but these days there is just NO male character to look up to (which in all honesty just be the guy you want to look up to, when you finally pull your head out of your ass and figure out what you want).

They emasculated Thor, Hawkeye, Doctor Strange and Obi Wan are side characters in their own movie/ show.

And Hulk is a set piece for She-Hulk to propagandize against to tell you, the male viewer, women treated BAD!

Look, that’s just what you’re gonna get when viewing Disney.

You don’t matter.

The ideology matters.

And if you want to change it, stop screaming into the void, make your own content or read manga and watch anime.

I had a chat with Chad from accounting about why this is happening, because you get more and more pandering in sports these days as well and the only conclusion I could think of was:


Cause everybody speaks green.

The reason why I think this is this.

Women earn less than men in general yet spend more, so why not pander to the highest spenders instead of the highest earners?

Just look at the over debt devision and spending devision.

Women spend a WHOLE lot more than men.

So wouldn’t you as any sane person pander to women more since they’re way less conservative with their spending habits?

I know I would, if more and more money was my ultimate goal.

The only problem companies will soon face is that they missed one thing.

Men and women are different.

I know, shocking right?

Men and women differ in interests. This has been shown countless times.

They’re being told to like comics and super hero movies now, but in general women don’t watch that crap. Look at the numbers, they barely do.

BUT the beauty about this, JUST LIKE THE STUENT DEBT CRISIS!

Is that men, as a whole, vote with their wallet.

They’re dropping out of college in droves, they’re stopping reading western comics in droves and they’re stopping going to watch Disney films in theaters IN DROVES.

That is the whole beauty of the free market.

Everybody speaks green.

Yet here you are screaming into the void your favorite character is being emasculated, while being fat, bearded and ugly.

If I were a woman I’d watch it just to piss you off 😉